Fri - December
29, 2006
Update your feeds!
The RSS file has moved. I've updated the blog
software to Wordpress, and the RSS URL has (out of necessity) changed
to:
http://www.toast442.org/feed
If
you're reading this, you've still got the old one.
Posted at 04:26 PM Permalink
|
Sun - October 15, 2006
Roomba monkey
Check out this über-creepy monkey
head mounted on a Roomba. I'm going to have nightmares for a
week.Link
Posted at 09:27 PM Permalink
|
Wed - September 27, 2006
Hosting sucks...
Is this thing on ... I hate switching providers -
everything breaks for a bit. If this makes it up there, I'll be super
surpsrised.
Update:
Well slap me silly - it appears everything is back
to normal. OK I admit - it was easier than I thought.
Posted at 12:36 AM Permalink
|
Wed - August 30, 2006
Daily Kos put to sleep...
Daily
Kos used to be my favorite place to get fairly solid reporting on
political news. Yes, the thing is ridiculously skewed toward the liberal side of
the fence and I tend to fence-sit, but the overall news gathering and digging
really stood out with good links to source material and
whatnot.However, there's been a
downward trend toward inanity there, which finally pushed me over the edge
today. The straw that broke the camel's back was this
one where there's an entire article and 300+ comments devoted to
proving once and for all that the idiot Lieberman's new campaign ad shows a
sunset ("a metaphor for the end of his senate career?") instead of the obviously
intended sunrise.They've got someone
digging up the original source
material from Getty and lengthly, apparently serious, discussions of
such important issues as:1. This can't
be a sunrise because only sunsets cause red sky
glow2. Where this picture was taken
couldn't be a sunrise because the beach faces the wrong
way3. The found original source isn't
really the right one, there's a slightly different one that is a better
fit4. Much mirth at Lieberman's
campaign manager who initially insisted that it was, indeed, a
sunrise.This goes on and on. As I
read, I realized that these people were completely out of it. This is but one
example of the idiocy that now typifies any given day at dkos. I can't take it
any more. The bad outweighs the good and it's too time consuming to sort through
the crap there.Buh
bye.
Posted at 04:01 PM Permalink
|
Wed - September 28, 2005
Screech
I
was reading some blogs this morning, and came across this ad on one (VERY)
conservative site. It's for a conservative dating company (whatever) but what's
up with the screeching loony pictured? Is that really attractive? It looks like
she giving some poor liberal anti-war hippie a beat down to show her new
conservative mate that she's committed to the cause. Maybe if she didn't look
like she's about to decapitate someone she wouldn't need a dating
service.
And who approved the use of
that stock photo for this company? Yikes.
Posted at 10:21 AM Permalink
|
Tue - September 6, 2005
Goodbye Little Buddy
Bob
Denver, aka Gilligan dead
at 70. He's to be buried in a coconut casket made by the
professor.
Posted at 02:57 PM Permalink
|
Tue - August 30, 2005
Americans Are Idiots?
Check out this
article from the NY Times (ridiculous registration required.) It's
about a survey conducted regularly for the past 30 years by Jon Miller at
Northwestern University Medical School in Chicago. Get this:
Dr. Miller's data reveal some yawning gaps in basic knowledge. American adults in general do not understand what molecules are (other than that they are really small). Fewer than a third can identify DNA as a key to heredity. Only about 10 percent know what radiation is. One adult American in five thinks the Sun revolves around the Earth, an idea science had abandoned by the 17th century. Read
that last sentence again. TWENTY PERCENT
OF ADULT AMERICANS THINK THE SUN REVOLVES AROUND THE EARTH.
I can almost forgive the molecules and DNA -
but the DAMN
SUN?
I now know how people can
wholeheartedly endorse such crap as intelligent design. They actually are
completely uninformed, and probably don't even know it.
UN - FREAKING -
BELIEVEABLE.
Posted at 12:30 PM Permalink
|
Wed - August 24, 2005
More On Pat Robertson
Check
out this freaking senile old weasel! On CNN.com today there's an
article in which Robertson claims:
"I didn't say 'assassination.' I said our special forces should 'take him out.' And 'take him out' can be a number of things, including kidnapping; there are a number of ways to take out a dictator from power besides killing him. I was misinterpreted by the AP, but that happens all the time," Didn't
say assassination, huh? Watch this video, then continue
reading.Done? Good. It doesn't get any
clearer than that. What the hell is this old fool thinking? We have him
ON VIDEO
for Christ's sake. He's outright
LYING to
the press about his
comments."If he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think we really ought to go ahead and do it," said Robertson on Monday's program. "It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war." If
you think I'm messing with the video, see CNN's version in the article linked
above.This moron is a complete and
utter lunatic. Anyone who supports this idiot has seriously got a screw loose.
He's called for dropping a nuke on the state department, indirectly called for
the deaths of three supreme court justices, and now this. This guy has lost his
mind, I believe literally. Someone needs to get him back to his nursing home and
crank up the meds.And to think this
man was a semi-serious contender for the Republican presidential nomination back
in '88. Very scary.Update
later in the afternoon: This guy really is some
piece of work. First we have "If he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I
think we really ought to go ahead and do it." Then the very next day, "I didn't
say 'assassination'," despite unambiguous video evidence to the contrary. Now we
have "Is it right to call for assassination? No, and
I apologize for that statement." Well, gee, isn't that special. I'm glad that
one of this country's so-called religious leaders clarified his position on
assassinating other heads of state. What a jerk.
Posted at 12:32 PM Permalink
|
Tue - August 23, 2005
America's Taliban
Pat Robertson has officially jumped the shark -
on national television he called for the assassination of Venezuela's President
Chavez. Yes, he wants the US to kill the leader of another sovereign country.
He's not harboring terrorists. He hasn't threatened to nuke DC. He isn't
amassing troops on our borders. He does, however, have a big old pile of oil and
likes Castro just a little too
much.Like or hate Chavez, this kind of
talk is precisely the thing that lots of people bash Muslims for - the fatwas
and whatnot. Yet here we have a mainstream
so-called Christian leader calling for the assassination of another human
being. How is this any different? All these
religious nutcases are of the same
cloth.Disgusting.Link
to CNN article.
Posted at 09:34 AM Permalink
|
Mon - August 22, 2005
Tylenol Commercial
Thanks to Tivo, I don't see too many commercials,
but tonight I was semi-paying attention and out of the corner of my eye saw this
screen completely filled with a pore-revealing close-up of some woman shot by a
semi-drunken baboon. It was for Tylenol. The woman went on to explain that she
gets a lot of headaches "almost every day" and that she used to just take
whatever was laying around to alleviate the pain. But then she learned that
aspirin could cause problems with her stomach - problems she couldn't even feel!
And she says - "I'm not OK with that." So she started taking Tylenol and now
life is all peaches and clean
toilets.What strikes me as really
freaking strange about this is that she says she gets headaches almost every
day. But somehow this concerns her not one whit. It's the theoretical damage to
her stomach that gives her sleepless nights. That brain tumor keeps growing in
her frontal lobe, but at least her stomach is
A-OK!Just nobody tell her about the
damage to her liver that could be occurring by taking the stupid Tylenol every
damn day. She wouldn't be OK with
that.I personally nominate this for
the dumbest commercial of the
year.Update:
Check it out! An actual copy of the commercial. (2.0 MiB,
Quicktime)
Posted at 09:33 PM Permalink
|
Fri - May 27, 2005
Banning Pointy Knives in Britain
I can hardly believe that this
isn't a joke article. But it's on CNN's website. Doctors in Britain
are calling for the banning of large pointed kitchen knives. That is, no more
traditional chef knives. In the kitchen. The knife is the most popular murder
weapon in Britain, and the claim is made that the easy availability of the
pointy kitchen knife makes impulse killings fueled by alcohol or, perhaps,
stupidity far too easy.They propose
replacing these culinary killing machines with blunt-nosed varieties, saying
that there is no need for sharp pointy objects in the kitchen. They even
surveyed 10 whole chefs to prove it. Ten! So that's settled, then. Seriously,
what's next? If the knives are banned, it will be heavy blunt objects that go
next - until we're all drinking soup from plastic disposable bowls and playing
nerf cricket.
Posted at 09:56 AM Permalink
|
Fri - April 15, 2005
Tom DeLay Comes Out Against Your Right to Privacy
Tom DeLay (R-LaLa Land) has got more problems
than you can shake a pointed stick at, and he's not helping himself based on his
latest rumblings. Yes, he's finally apologized for calling for the impeachment
of federal justices with whom he disagreed with regarding the Schiavo nonsense.
And while the press is slobbering over these statements, he goes off again on
the
judiciary:"I blame Congress over the last 50 to 100 years for not standing up and taking its responsibility given to it by the Constitution. The reason the judiciary has been able to impose a separation of church and state that's nowhere in the Constitution is that Congress didn't stop them. The reason we had judicial review is because Congress didn't stop them. The reason we had a right to privacy is because Congress didn't stop them.(Italics mine)" Yes,
you read that right: Tom DeLay thinks that your right to privacy shouldn't
exist; wouldn't exist except for those activist judges. What kind of crack is
this guy smoking? Who the hell is against privacy? At least the first two items
he quoted has some semblance of support from some loony portion of the
population. But privacy? I doubt you'd find many people outside some
power-hungry politicians and nutjob law enforcement types that just can't stand
the fact they can't go through your mail legally that would endorse stripping
citizens of their right to privacy. (Well, that is, definitely not in such a
bold way, anyhow. Small erosions of our privacy are happening every damn
day.)This guy is seriously dangerous.
He sees his way out of the countless ethics violations heaped on him: he's
directing everyone's attention to some non-problem that few people support but
that can severely damage our government. In fact, check out this incredible
non-denial of his own problems. He doesn't give a shit, really (from
the Salon War
Room):DeLay also answered a couple questions about his alleged ethics violations, saying, "This stuff that's in the press is frivolous." But when Washington Times reporter Charles Hurt pressed the issue and asked if DeLay had ever "crossed the line of ethical behavior," DeLay turned a bit more demure. "Ever," he said, "is a very strong word."
Posted at 01:26 PM Permalink
|
Fri - April 1, 2005
Ms. Wheelchair Stripped of Title for Standing
This reads like something from The Onion. This CNN
article gives a quick story about Janeal Lee, who won the Ms.
Wheelchair Wisconsin pageant and was on her way to the nationals before being
stripped of her title for appearing in a picture standing
up.Candidates for the crown have to "mostly be seen in the public using their wheelchairs or scooters," said Judy Hoit, Ms. Wheelchair America's treasurer.
"Otherwise you've got women who are in their wheelchairs all the time and they get offended if they see someone standing up. We can't have title holders out there walking when they're seen in the public." Bizarre.
CNN.com doesn't do April Fool's Day articles, do they?
Posted at 08:52 AM Permalink
|
Thu - March 24, 2005
More Worrying Intelligent Design Nonsense
This opinion
piece from Jay Mathews in the Washington Post is yet another
in a long string of articles that have been appearing in the mainstream press
over the past few months. Like the others, this piece has the author claiming
that he sees no problem with teaching ID and the theory of evolution side by
side. He says this is ok because students and teachers alike get a lot out of
comparing and contrasting these two
theories.To be fair, Mr. Mathews seems
like he comes down fairly on the side of science when talking about this, but
it's hard to tell here. He's treating ID like it has some sort of
near-equivalency with evolution. The problem is that, of course, it doesn't. I'm
cool with teaching the history of theories that didn't make it when talking
about evolution. Hell - go all Lamarckian on the
little punks - at least it was a valid theory in it's day. Heck, even where
there is some real debate about the theories there is no real problem teaching
all sides. But this ID crap is nothing but religion wrapped in pseudo-science.
It's not an alternate theory of how life came to be. Keep it out of the
classroom please.
Posted at 07:57 PM Permalink
|
Sat
- March 19, 2005
Science is Losing
Check out this
article in the NY Times. It says that several IMAX theaters -
including some in science
museums - are refusing to show films that
mention evolution, the Big Bang, or even the geology of the Earth. All for fear
that there may be protesters against these films because they contradict
Biblical teachings. Let me rephrase: Science museums are refusing to show films
for fear of religious nutcases. Where the hell are we, the Taliban's
Afghanistan? From the article:
The number of theaters rejecting such films is small, people in the industry say - perhaps a dozen or fewer, most in the South. But because only a few dozen Imax theaters routinely show science documentaries, the decisions of a few can have a big impact on a film's bottom line - or a producer's decision to make a documentary in the first place. This
is getting out of hand. I think we need a hardcore gang of protesters that are
funded to protest outside of these churches for teaching things that make them
sound dumb. This country is going back to the Dark Ages.
Posted at 02:01 PM Permalink
|
|
Quick Links
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
- H.L. Mencken
Calendar
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat
|
Why the hell doesn't IE 6 support transparent PNGs?
Categories
Archives
PHOTO ALBUMS
The Photo Galleries are offline at the moment. I've moved the site to a new provider and haven't had time to set them up.
OS X Software
Windows Software
Miscellaneous Stuff
RSS Feed
» RSS feed for Toast442.org
Statistics
Total entries in this blog:
Total entries in this category:
Published On: Dec 29, 2006 04:26 PM
|